This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
A man from Essex was sentenced to five years in prison for using AI to generate and distribute non-consensual sexually explicit deepfake imagery of at least 20 women and a minor. The perpetrator manipulated social media photos and shared them alongside personal details in forums promoting sexual violence. This case represents one of the first major prosecutions under UK law regarding the sharing of sexually explicit deepfakes.
Between March 2023 and May 2024, Brandon Tyler of Essex used AI to generate explicit deepfake pornography of at least 20 women he knew personally, including a 16-year-old. He manipulated their social media photos and shared them, along with their personal details, in online forums promoting sexual violence. He was sentenced to five years in prison in April 2025 under the UK's criminal law against sharing sexually explicit deepfakes, in what is one of the first major prosecutions of its kind.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The generated explicit deepfakes were shared on a public forum glorifying rape culture, exposing users and victims to highly toxic and abusive content.
The perpetrator used AI to generate non-consensual sexually explicit deepfakes to target, humiliate, and harass specific victims for personal gratification.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The harm was caused by a human perpetrator who intentionally used deployed AI tools to generate and distribute non-consensual deepfakes to harass and humiliate victims.
Added categories peak at 3: Substantial (Child Sexual Exploitation & Abuse (CSEA), Direct)
A domestic criminal case in the UK involving the creation and distribution of non-consensual explicit deepfakes of 21 individuals. While representing a severe violation of individual privacy and a landmark legal prosecution under the Online Safety Act, the incident carries negligible national security implications as it did not target critical infrastructure, state functions, or population-scale stability.
The AI was used as a simple image manipulation tool to edit photos and remove clothing based on direct user inputs, without exhibiting autonomous planning or conversational assistant capabilities.
Limited Risk: The AI system was used to generate deepfakes, which are subject to specific transparency obligations under the EU AI Act.
The perpetrator used AI to generate sexually explicit deepfake images of women by manipulating their social media photos, specifically using AI to remove their clothing.
The report provides clear, detailed factual information about the court case, the number of victims, the nature of the AI's use, and the resulting harms. There is no ambiguity about the perpetrator's intent or the consequences of his actions.
None
Technology
AI Deepfake Tools
AI algorithms allowed easy removal of clothing from photos.
Online Forums
Anonymized forums facilitated sharing and glorification of abuse.
Data Inputs
Public Social Media Photos
Victims public photos on Instagram were harvested for manipulation.
Personal Information
Victims names and phone numbers were input to maximize distress.
Human Factors
Toxic Masculinity
The perpetrators desire to humiliate and degrade women.
Porn Addiction
Perpetrator struggled with a long-term porn addiction.
Process and Methods
Social Media Trawling
Targeted planning by scraping images from victims accounts.
Malicious Image Editing
Systematic process of editing and uploading graphic deepfakes.
Regulatory Environment
Lagging Creation Laws
Legislation to criminalize deepfake creation was only in committee stage.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
