A deepfake video circulating on Facebook falsely depicts actor Taiwo Ajai-Lycett and influencer Chinonso Egemba promoting an unproven cure for hypertension. The video, which has been viewed over 98,000 times, uses AI-generated audio and visuals to impersonate the individuals. Both parties have denied involvement, and medical experts confirm that no such cure exists.
Fact-checking reports that a purported AI-generated video circulated on Facebook depicting veteran actor Taiwo Ajai-Lycett discussing a hypertension diagnosis and promoting an unproven treatment by influencer Chinonso Egemba. According to the report, the video exhibited signs of AI generation, including unnatural speech and mismatched lip movements. Both Ajai-Lycett and Egemba have denied involvement, and no credible medical evidence supports the claimed cure.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The video spreads false medical claims about a cure for hypertension, which could lead to health risks if believed.
The incident involves a deepfake video impersonating public figures to promote a non-existent hypertension cure, which is an AI-enabled scam designed to deceive people for potential financial or personal gain.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by human actors who intentionally created and deployed a deepfake video using AI tools to mislead the public.
Added categories peak at 3: Substantial (Epistemic Harm, Inferred)
A medical deepfake scam in Nigeria impersonated a doctor and actor to promote a fake hypertension cure. While posing localized public health risks and demonstrating the ongoing challenge of synthetic media, the incident has negligible national security implications and does not involve state actors or critical infrastructure threats.
The AI system was used as a tool by human creators to generate synthetic voice and video matching the likeness of the targets based on direct inputs.
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content such as deepfakes, which falls under Risk Level 3 due to transparency obligations regarding synthetic media.
The AI system was used to generate a deepfake video and synthetic voices of the two public figures to make them appear to endorse a product.
The report clearly identifies the video as a deepfake, details the platform (Facebook), the view count (98,000+), and the specific individuals impersonated. The facts are verified by Africa Check, leaving little ambiguity about the nature of the incident.
None. The video is clearly a synthetic scam.
Technology
AI Voice Cloning Technology
Generates highly realistic synthetic voices of public figures.
Lip-Syncing AI Tools
Syncs synthetic voices with existing video footage of targets.
Data Inputs
Publicly Available Media
Public videos of influencers provide ample training data for AI cloning.
Human Factors
Public Trust in Influencers
Viewers trust medical influencers, making them vulnerable to scams.
Low Digital Literacy
Users struggle to identify synthetic speech and lip-sync issues.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Platform Moderation
Facebook failed to detect and block the synthetic scam video automatically.
Missing Deepfake Detection
Social media lack active tools to flag AI-altered medical claims.
Management
Ineffective Response to Repeat Scams
Platform failed to prevent recurring deepfakes targeting same influencer.
Regulatory Environment
Lack of Deepfake Regulations
Absence of strict legal frameworks targeting AI impersonation scams.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.