This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
A federal jury found blogger Milagro Gramz liable for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress after she promoted a sexually explicit AI-generated deepfake of rapper Megan Thee Stallion. The blogger was part of a campaign to spread misinformation regarding a 2020 shooting involving the rapper and Tory Lanez. The court awarded the victim $59,000 in damages, establishing legal accountability for the promotion of AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery.
A blogger, Milagro Gramz, was reportedly found liable for promoting and amplifying a sexually explicit AI-generated deepfake depicting rapper Megan Thee Stallion as part of an online harassment campaign linked to misinformation about her 2020 shooting. Court filings alleged the blogger encouraged followers to view the altered content and spread defamatory claims. In December 2025, a federal jury reportedly awarded damages for harassment and promotion of the deepfake.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The blogger willfully encouraged thousands of social media followers to view the sexually explicit deepfake, exposing a large audience to toxic and non-consensual pornographic content.
The deepfake video generated and spread false visual information depicting the victim in a sexual act she did not participate in.
The incident involved the creation and targeted dissemination of a sexually explicit deepfake video to humiliate, harass, and defame a specific victim, which aligns with targeted manipulation and humiliating imagery under sub-domain 4.3.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The harm was caused by a human blogger intentionally sharing and promoting a sexually explicit deepfake video to harass and defame the victim after the AI model's deployment.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Psychological Harm, Direct)
A federal jury found a blogger liable for promoting an AI-generated sexually explicit deepfake of a public figure. While representing a severe individual privacy violation and highlighting the growing legal accountability for non-consensual synthetic media, the incident has negligible direct national security implications.
The AI system was used as a tool to generate a sexually explicit deepfake video of the victim. The reports describe the video as an 'altered sexual depiction' and 'deepfake pornographic video', indicating a tool-based manipulation of existing likenesses.
Risk Level 3: Limited Risk. The EU AI Act classifies 'AI-generated content such as deepfakes' under Limited Risk, which imposes specific transparency obligations to ensure users are informed that the content is AI-generated.
The AI system was used to generate a sexually explicit deepfake video of the victim, which was then shared and promoted on social media platforms.
The reports provide clear and consistent details about the legal trial, the jury's verdict, the specific damages awarded ($59,000), and the nature of the AI-generated content (a sexually explicit deepfake). The role of the blogger in promoting the deepfake is explicitly documented across multiple reputable news sources.
None. The legal verdict clearly establishes the facts of the case regarding the deepfake's promotion and the resulting harm.
While the specific AI generator model is unknown, this detail is not strictly necessary to classify the incident's domain, causal factors, or harms.
Technology
Deepfake Generation
Sophisticated AI tools enabled the creation of the realistic explicit video.
Data Inputs
Biometric Likeness Theft
Victim's personal likeness was harvested to generate unauthorized explicit media.
Human Factors
Willful Harassment by Blogger
The blogger actively encouraged followers to view the explicit deepfake.
Targeted Cyberbullying
Followers participated in the spread and harassment of the victim.
Process and Methods
Ineffective Content Moderation
Social media platforms allowed the deepfake video to circulate widely.
Lack of Source Verification
No verification process existed to block non-consensual altered media.
Management
Platform Accountability Deficit
Social media management failed to prevent viral spread of deepfake harassment.
Regulatory Environment
Inadequate Civil Protections
The legal system relied on retroactive defamation suits rather than prevention.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
