This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
A Washington State Patrol trooper has filed a lawsuit alleging that coworkers created and circulated a non-consensual AI-generated deepfake video depicting him in an intimate encounter. The lawsuit claims this incident, along with other instances of harassment, constitutes discrimination based on his sexual orientation. The agency has not commented on the pending litigation.
A Washington State Patrol trooper filed a lawsuit alleging that coworkers circulated a purported AI-generated deepfake video falsely depicting him in an intimate encounter with another trooper. According to the complaint, the non-consensual video was shared within the workplace and contributed to harassment and discrimination based on his sexual orientation. The creator of the video has not been publicly identified, and the agency has declined to comment due to pending litigation.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The deepfake video constitutes toxic and harassing content circulated within a workplace environment.
The incident involves the creation of humiliating synthetic imagery (a deepfake video) targeting a specific victim for harassment, which falls under targeted manipulation and abuse of likeness.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by humans (coworkers) who intentionally created and circulated the deepfake video to harass the trooper using a post-deployment AI tool.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Psychological Harm, Indirect)
A Washington State Patrol trooper filed a lawsuit alleging coworkers used AI to create a non-consensual deepfake video to harass him. While representing a serious case of workplace discrimination and weaponized synthetic media, the incident is a localized civil matter with negligible national security implications.
The AI system was used as a tool to generate a synthetic video (deepfake) based on direct user inputs, performing a specific, well-defined function without autonomous planning or decision-making.
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content (a deepfake), which falls under Risk Level 3 due to transparency and disclosure obligations associated with synthetic media.
The primary function of the AI system involved was to generate a deepfake video depicting the trooper in a fabricated scenario.
The report clearly outlines the allegations of the lawsuit and the nature of the deepfake video. However, details about the specific AI tool used, the creators of the video, and the exact scope of its circulation are missing because the lawsuit is pending and the agency has not commented.
The incident could be viewed primarily as a human harassment case where AI was merely incidental, but the use of deepfake technology is central to the specific harassment claim.
The identity of the AI tool used, the technical sophistication of the deepfake, and the specific individuals responsible for its creation.
Technology
Accessible Deepfake Technology
AI tools allowed easy creation of realistic fake videos of the trooper.
Lack of Deepfake Detection
No automated systems to detect or block deepfake media in WSP systems.
Data Inputs
Unauthorized Personal Media
Coworkers used photos of the trooper to train the AI deepfake model.
Human Factors
Homophobic Discrimination
Coworkers targeted the trooper based on his sexual orientation.
Malicious Intent to Harass
WSP members intentionally used AI to create humiliating media.
Lack of AI Ethics Awareness
Employees lacked understanding of the ethical boundaries of AI use.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Media Monitoring
No process to monitor and flag deepfake content within the agency.
Flawed Reporting Procedures
Lack of clear channels to report AI-enabled harassment in the workplace.
Management
Failure to Prevent Harassment
Management did not maintain a safe, non-discriminatory workplace.
Lack of AI Use Policies
WSP management failed to establish policies regarding deepfakes and AI.
Regulatory Environment
Weak Deepfake Regulations
Lack of strong legal frameworks prohibiting non-consensual deepfakes.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
