Actress Angel Aquino and content creator Queen Hera testified at a Philippine Senate hearing regarding the proliferation of non-consensual AI-generated deepfake pornography. Aquino described the experience as a 'digital assault' that violates personal dignity, while Hera recounted the discovery of a deepfake image of her daughter on the dark web. The hearing aimed to advocate for stronger legislation to hold perpetrators and platforms accountable for the spread of such content.
In Manila, actress Angel Aquino reportedly said in a hearing how AI-generated deepfake porn video unlawfully used her face. She reportedly testified at a Senate hearing led by Sen. Risa Hontiveros and urged punishment for creators and those sharing the purported deepfakes. Influencer Queen Hera also reported a deepfake image of her daughter on the dark web; tools and perpetrators were reportedly not identified.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The incident involves the creation and distribution of sexually explicit, non-consensual deepfake pornography, exposing victims and online spaces to toxic content.
The incident involves the creation of non-consensual deepfake pornography targeting specific individuals for humiliation and carnal entertainment, which falls under targeted manipulation and harassment using synthetic imagery.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by human actors intentionally using deployed AI generation tools to create non-consensual deepfake pornographic content of the victims.
Added categories peak at 3: Substantial (Child Sexual Exploitation & Abuse (CSEA), Direct)
Philippine Senate hearing addresses the proliferation of non-consensual AI-generated deepfake pornography targeting public figures and minors. While highlighting significant human rights and privacy concerns, the incident represents localized malicious use of AI tools rather than a direct threat to national security.
The AI systems were used as tools by human perpetrators to perform a specific, well-defined function: superimposing faces onto explicit images and videos. The report describes the technology as 'vile manipulation' and 'deepfake materials' created by perpetrators, indicating the AI operated on direct input to produce synthetic media.
Limited Risk: The report describes the creation of deepfakes, which under the EU AI Act are classified as limited risk, requiring specific transparency obligations to inform users that the content is AI-generated.
The AI technology was used specifically to generate deepfake videos (in the case of Angel Aquino) and deepfake images (in the case of Queen Hera's daughter) by superimposing their faces onto explicit content.
The report provides clear, direct testimonies from two victims detailing the nature of the deepfake abuse, the emotional impact, and the context of a Senate hearing. While the specific AI models used are not named, the description of the technology's application (deepfake generation) and the resulting harms are unambiguous.
None. The incident is clearly a case of non-consensual deepfake pornography.
Technology
Deepfake AI Generation
AI algorithms superimpose faces onto non-consensual pornographic videos.
Easy Access to AI Tools
Availability of AI tools allows malicious actors to easily create deepfakes.
Data Inputs
Publicly Shared Media
Innocent photos and videos posted online are harvested for deepfake creation.
Human Factors
Malicious Intent of Perpetrators
Perpetrators exploit AI for carnal entertainment and digital assault.
Platform User Sharing
Users sharing and reposting deepfake materials accelerates the damage.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Content Moderation
Websites and platforms turn a blind eye to deepfakes spreading online.
Lack of Rapid Takedown Systems
Absence of effective reporting processes to quickly remove harmful content.
Management
Profitization of Deepfakes
Platforms make money out of deepfake views, prioritizing profit over safety.
Neglecting User Safety
Platform management fails to protect women and children from digital assault.
Regulatory Environment
Absence of Strong Laws
Lack of enforceable legislation to punish deepfake creators and hosts.
Lack of Regulatory Enforcement
Regulatory bodies fail to hold hosting platforms accountable.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.