This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
The Media Development Agency of Azerbaijan issued a warning regarding the circulation of AI-generated deepfake videos on social media. These videos falsely depicted the country's defense and foreign ministers discussing the alleged downing of a Belarusian aircraft in Russian airspace. The agency confirmed the content was fabricated using AI to manipulate public opinion and urged citizens to rely only on official sources.
Azerbaijan's Media Development Agency reported that purportedly AI-generated deepfake videos circulated on social media appearing to show statements by Azerbaijan's defense and foreign ministers (Zakir Hasanov and Jeyhun Bayramov, respectively) about the alleged downing of a Belarusian aircraft in Russian airspace. The agency reportedly denied the videos were authentic and called them an information manipulation effort aimed at misleading public opinion.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to conduct large-scale disinformation campaigns, malicious surveillance, or targeted and sophisticated automated censorship and propaganda, with the aim of manipulating political processes, public opinion, and behavior.
Also classified as
The deepfake videos generated and spread false claims about a military incident involving a Belarusian aircraft.
The incident involves the intentional creation and dissemination of deepfake videos of high-ranking government officials to manipulate public opinion and spread geopolitical disinformation.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by human actors intentionally creating and distributing deepfake videos post-deployment to manipulate public opinion.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Epistemic Harm, Direct)
AI-generated deepfake videos falsely depicted Azerbaijan's defense and foreign ministers discussing a sensitive military event involving Belarus and Russia. While the campaign targeted high-level officials to manipulate public opinion, prompt government denial mitigated the immediate national security impact, limiting it primarily to information warfare.
The AI system was used as a tool to generate synthetic video and audio content based on direct inputs, without exhibiting autonomous planning or decision-making capabilities of its own.
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content, specifically deepfakes, which are subject to transparency obligations under the EU AI Act to ensure users are aware the content is synthetic.
The reports explicitly state that the videos were created using 'deep fake' technologies to fabricate statements from government officials, which involves generating synthetic video and matching synthetic voice.
The reports from official Azerbaijani media sources clearly describe the nature of the incident, the specific officials targeted, the false claims made, and the technology used (deepfakes). There is no conflicting information regarding the falsity of the videos.
None. The event is clearly a state-targeted deepfake disinformation campaign.
Technology
Deepfake Video Generation
AI was used to create highly realistic fake videos of public officials.
Social Media Distribution
Social media platforms allowed rapid dissemination of the manipulated footage.
Data Inputs
Official Likeness Exploitation
Publicly available video and audio of ministers were used to train AI models.
Human Factors
Public Vulnerability to Deception
Social media users may easily believe realistic deepfakes without verification.
Malicious Actor Intent
Individuals intentionally created fakes to manipulate public opinion.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Content Verification
Social media platforms failed to flag or block the deepfake videos promptly.
Regulatory Environment
Lack of Deepfake Regulation
Absence of strict legal frameworks governing AI-generated disinformation.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
