This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
During Ireland's 2024 general election, political candidate Gráinne Seoige was the target of a campaign involving the circulation of AI-generated non-consensual sexual imagery. The victim reported that the incident caused significant trauma and professional damage, leading to an ongoing Garda investigation. Seoige has since advocated for stricter legal accountability for social media platforms and the criminalization of AI-generated sexual imagery.
A reported deepfake abuse campaign targeted Gráinne Seoige during her run in Ireland's 2024 general election campaign, when pornographic, purportedly AI-generated images of her were reportedly circulated online. Seoige later described the experience as humiliating and traumatic, and Gardaí said they were investigating the distribution of the material.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The incident involved the creation and online spread of sexually explicit, non-consensual synthetic imagery.
The deepfakes were distributed as part of a coordinated political campaign to influence public opinion and sabotage an election.
The incident involved the creation and circulation of non-consensual pornographic deepfakes of a specific victim to target, humiliate, and politically disadvantage her.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The risk and harm were caused by the intentional decision of human political opponents to generate and distribute deepfake pornography to damage the victim's campaign.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Psychological Harm, Direct)
During Ireland's 2024 general election, candidate Grainne Seoige was targeted by political opponents using AI-generated non-consensual sexual deepfakes to sabotage her campaign. The incident represents a minor national security impact, highlighting the evolving threat of localized, AI-enabled information manipulation and election interference, which was managed under standard domestic law enforcement procedures.
The AI system was used as a tool by political opponents to generate synthetic pornographic images of the victim. It performed a specific, well-defined function of image generation based on direct inputs without exhibiting autonomous planning or agency.
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content, specifically deepfakes, which are subject to transparency obligations under the EU AI Act to ensure users are aware the content is synthetic.
The AI system was used to generate highly realistic, non-consensual pornographic images of a real person, which is the definition of deepfake image generation.
The reports provide clear, consistent, and detailed accounts of the incident, including direct quotes from the victim, details of the ongoing police investigation, and the specific impacts on her career and mental health. There is no ambiguity about the nature of the AI's role as a generator of deepfake pornography.
None
Technology
AI Deepfake Image Generators
Easy access to AI tools allows creation of realistic non-consensual images.
Algorithmic Amplification
Social media algorithms spread sensational deepfake content rapidly.
Data Inputs
Unprotected Public Images
Public photos from social media were harvested to generate deepfakes.
Human Factors
Malicious Political Intent
Opponents deliberately used deepfakes to sabotage a political campaign.
Victim Silence and Shame
Trauma and social shame delayed public reporting of the digital abuse.
Process and Methods
Slow Content Moderation
Platforms failed to quickly detect and remove harmful deepfakes.
Inadequate Reporting Channels
No effective real-time mechanism to halt the spread of flagged images.
Management
Safety Investment Deficit
Platforms prioritize growth and engagement over robust safety systems.
Regulatory Environment
Untested Deepfake Laws
Legislation like Coco's Law is untested for adult manipulated deepfakes.
Lack of Platform Liability
No legal duties or penalties exist for platforms failing to act on deepfakes.
Limited Enforcement Powers
Police lack real-time powers to quickly stop the spread of digital abuse.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
