This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn unsealed criminal complaints against two men for allegedly creating and distributing hundreds of albums of nonconsensual AI-generated deepfake pornography. The defendants, arrested in New Jersey and Texas, are among the first to be charged under the TAKE IT DOWN Act. The content, which depicted approximately 140 women including public figures and private individuals, was hosted on adult content platforms and viewed millions of times.
In one of the first prosecutions under the TAKE IT DOWN Act, DOJ alleged that New Jersey defendant Cornelius Shannon published at least 360 albums of AI-generated deepfake pornography depicting about 90 women, including public figures, beginning during a charged period anchored to May 2025. Prosecutors said the content appeared on an adult image- and video-sharing platform and was viewed millions of times.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The generated deepfake pornography was published on public adult platforms and viewed millions of times, exposing internet users to toxic and nonconsensual explicit content.
The defendants used AI systems to generate and publish nonconsensual sexually explicit deepfakes of specific identifiable women, which constitutes targeted humiliation and creation of sexual imagery.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by human defendants who intentionally used deployed generative AI tools to create and distribute nonconsensual deepfake pornography.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Psychological Harm, Direct)
Two US citizens were arrested for creating and distributing hundreds of albums of AI-generated nonconsensual deepfake pornography depicting approximately 140 women, including public and political figures. While the incident represents a severe violation of individual privacy and human dignity, its direct national security impact is minor and manageable under domestic law enforcement procedures.
The defendants used generative AI software as a tool to perform a specific function: morphing real photos of individuals into explicit sexual images. The AI operated on direct inputs to produce these outputs without exhibiting independent planning or autonomous decision-making.
Limited Risk: The report describes the creation of 'AI-generated digital forgeries (deepfake) pornography' which falls under the transparency and disclosure obligations of Limited Risk systems.
The defendants used AI specifically to generate nonconsensual deepfake images and videos depicting real people in sexually explicit scenarios.
The reports provide clear, detailed, and consistent information regarding the arrests, the specific charges under the TAKE IT DOWN Act, the number of victims (~140), and the scale of the distribution (millions of views). The role of AI as a tool for generating deepfakes is explicitly stated.
None. The facts of the criminal complaints are straightforward.
Technology
Sophisticated Generative AI Tools
Allowed users to easily morph real photos into explicit sexual images.
Lack of Guardrails in AI Tools
AI tools like Grok lacked blocks to prevent generating explicit deepfakes.
Data Inputs
Use of Non-Consensual Real Photos
Defendants used real public and private photos of victims to generate fakes.
Human Factors
Predatory Intent of Defendants
Defendants actively sought to degrade and violate victims for online views.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Platform Moderation
Websites failed to quickly remove nonconsensual intimate deepfake images.
Lack of Image Removal Processes
Platforms lacked clear processes for victims to request removal of deepfakes.
Management
Platform Profit and Engagement Focus
Websites hosted explicit content to drive millions of views and traffic.
Regulatory Environment
Historical Regulatory Gaps
The TAKE IT DOWN Act was only recently enacted to criminalize deepfakes.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
