This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
AI-generated videos were circulated on Facebook depicting fabricated tense exchanges between Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti and former President Vjosa Osmani. These videos, which appeared during the lead-up to the June 2026 snap elections, utilized unnatural body movements and mismatched synthetic voices. Fact-checkers confirmed the content was AI-generated, noting that the videos repurposed footage from previous events to create a false narrative of conflict between the two political figures.
Purportedly AI-generated Facebook videos reportedly fabricated tense exchanges between Kosovo leaders Albin Kurti and Vjosa Osmani before the June 7, 2026 snap elections. The videos allegedly used prior images and had unnatural body movements, as well as purportedly mismatched synthetic voices.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to conduct large-scale disinformation campaigns, malicious surveillance, or targeted and sophisticated automated censorship and propaganda, with the aim of manipulating political processes, public opinion, and behavior.
Also classified as
The AI system was used to generate fabricated videos and synthetic voices that spread false information about political figures.
The incident involved the coordinated creation and dissemination of AI-generated political deepfakes on Facebook to influence public opinion and political processes during an election campaign.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was initiated by human actors who intentionally used deployed AI tools to generate and spread deceptive political deepfakes.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Epistemic Harm, Direct)
AI-generated deepfake videos targeting Kosovo's Prime Minister and former President were circulated during an election campaign to manipulate voters. While quickly debunked and causing no physical harm, the incident represents a substantial attempt to disrupt sovereignty and democratic government processes using synthetic media.
The AI system acted as a tool to generate synthetic video and voice outputs based on user inputs (photos and text/audio prompts) without exhibiting autonomous planning or decision-making.
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content such as deepfakes, which are subject to specific transparency obligations under the EU AI Act.
The AI system was primarily used to generate fabricated videos of political figures, accompanied by synthetic voice generation.
The report clearly details the nature of the incident, the specific political figures targeted, the platform used (Facebook), and the fact-checking process that confirmed the videos were AI-generated deepfakes.
None. The incident is a straightforward case of political deepfakes used for election disinformation.
Technology
AI Deepfake Generation Tools
AI tools allowed fabrication of realistic video and voice clones of politicians.
Unnatural Body and Voice Synthesis
Algorithms generated unnatural body movements and mismatched voices in videos.
Data Inputs
Use of Public Event Photos
Publicly available images from official events were used to train the AI.
Political Agreement Footage
Footage from past joint political appearances was used to fabricate conflict.
Human Factors
Intentional Political Deception
Actors deliberately created deepfakes to mislead voters during elections.
Audience Susceptibility
Social media users may believe realistic political confrontations.
Process and Methods
Algorithmic Moderation Gaps
Facebook processes failed to proactively block AI-generated political fakes.
Delayed Fact-Checking Detection
Verification occurred only after the fabricated videos had circulated online.
Management
Inadequate Platform Oversight
Facebook page management allowed unverified political deepfakes to be posted.
Regulatory Environment
Lack of Deepfake Regulation
Absence of strict legal frameworks governing AI-generated political content.
AI system involved
An AI system was involved, but the reports do not identify it.
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
