During the June 2026 parliamentary election campaign in Kosovo, several AI-generated videos were circulated on Facebook. These videos depicted political candidates, including Albin Kurti and Vjosa Osmani, in fabricated scenes such as eating together or working in a beauty salon. The content was identified as AI-generated, with some videos bearing the 'MetaAI' logo, and was used to misrepresent the candidates' activities to the public.
Videos reported as AI-fabricated circulated on Facebook during Kosovo's June 2026 parliamentary campaign, placing Albin Kurti, Vjosa Osmani, Lumir Abdixhiku, and other candidates in staged scenes of party camaraderie and personal degradation.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to conduct large-scale disinformation campaigns, malicious surveillance, or targeted and sophisticated automated censorship and propaganda, with the aim of manipulating political processes, public opinion, and behavior.
Also classified as
The AI-generated videos presented false and fabricated scenarios of political figures to mislead voters.
The incident involved the coordinated creation and dissemination of AI-generated deepfakes of political candidates during an active election campaign, aiming to influence public opinion and political processes.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by human actors who intentionally generated and distributed deepfake videos of political candidates to mislead the public during an election campaign.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Epistemic Harm, Direct)
During the June 2026 election campaign in Kosovo, AI-generated deepfakes of political candidates in mundane scenarios were circulated on Facebook. While targeting key political figures during an election, the benign nature of the content and quick debunking by fact-checkers limited the national security impact to a minor level.
The AI system (MetaAI) acted as a tool to generate synthetic media (images/videos) based on direct user prompts, without exhibiting autonomous planning or decision-making.
Limited Risk: The incident involves AI-generated content, specifically deepfakes, which are subject to transparency obligations under the EU AI Act to ensure users are aware they are interacting with synthetic media.
The AI system was used to generate realistic but entirely fabricated videos of political figures to be shared on social media.
The report clearly details the nature of the deepfakes, the political figures targeted, the platform used (MetaAI), and the fact-checking process that exposed the fabrication. There is little ambiguity regarding the events described.
None.
Technology
Easy Generative AI Access
MetaAI and other tools allow users to easily generate realistic fake media.
Inadequate Platform Guardrails
Generative tools lack strict filters to block generating political figures.
Data Inputs
Abundant Public Political Media
Large volumes of public images of politicians are available to train AI.
Human Factors
Intent to Mislead Voters
Actors maliciously generate fakes to influence public opinion in elections.
Low User Digital Literacy
Social media users share fabricated content without verifying its origin.
Process and Methods
Reactive Content Moderation
Platforms rely on post-upload reporting instead of proactive AI detection.
Delayed Fact-Checking Process
Verification organizations only flag fakes after they have spread widely.
Management
Growth Prioritized Over Safety
AI companies release tools without sufficient safeguards against political abuse.
Regulatory Environment
Weak Deepfake Regulations
Lack of legal frameworks to penalize AI-generated political disinformation.
AI system involved
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.