This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
Law enforcement officers across the United States misused the Flock Safety AI-powered license-plate reader system to stalk, harass, and track their romantic partners, ex-partners, and other women without authorization.
Kechi, Kansas police lieutenant Victor Heiar used Wichita police's Flock Safety license-plate reader system to search his estranged wife's plate and review her movements over the prior month. An arrest affidavit said Heiar acknowledged knowing the use was improper; his wife said she felt violated and unsafe. He later pleaded guilty to misdemeanor stalking and computer crime and received 18 months' probation.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
Victims were subjected to targeted harassment, stalking, and threatening communications facilitated by the real-time tracking capabilities of the system.
The system lacked robust access controls, mandatory case-number validation, and proactive auditing, leaving it vulnerable to unauthorized insider manipulation and data abuse.
The incident involves rogue law enforcement officers using the AI surveillance system to target, stalk, and manipulate specific victims for personal reasons and control, which aligns with targeted manipulation under boundary rule B1.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The risk and subsequent harms were caused by the intentional decisions of human law enforcement officers to misuse the deployed AI system for unauthorized personal surveillance.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Psychological Harm, Direct)
Dozens of US law enforcement officers abused the Flock Safety AI license-plate tracking system to illegally stalk and harass women. While not a threat to national sovereignty or physical infrastructure, the widespread insider misuse of mass AI surveillance tools by state actors represents a substantial threat to civil liberties, privacy, and public trust in government institutions.
The Flock Safety system operates as a tool that performs a specific, well-defined function (reading license plates and matching them against databases) based on direct inputs (camera feeds and search queries) without independent goal-directed planning or autonomous agency.
High Risk: The system is a law enforcement application used for real-time and historical tracking of individuals, which has significant implications for safety, fundamental rights, and public interests.
The primary function of the Flock Safety system is to capture, read, and log vehicle license plates using computer vision, which is then used for localized smart surveillance and tracking.
The reports provide extensive, detailed, and consistent factual accounts of multiple specific incidents of system misuse across different states, backed by court records, police affidavits, and direct quotes from victims, police officials, and the AI developer's executive.
None; the facts clearly point to unauthorized personal surveillance and stalking by law enforcement officers using the AI tool.
Technology
AI-Enabled Tracking and Search
Computer vision and machine-learning vehicle fingerprinting enabled tracking.
Lack of Automated Alert Filters
No proactive system alerts existed to flag suspicious, repetitive queries.
Data Inputs
Indiscriminate Mass Plate Scans
System continuously records all passing license plates into a searchable database.
Optional Search Justification
System allowed vague one-word entries instead of mandatory case numbers.
Human Factors
Abuse of Power by Officers
Law enforcement officers used system access for personal stalking and harassment.
Victim Retribution Fears
Victims hesitated to report because abusers possessed guns and badges.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Audit Log Reviews
Police departments failed to conduct routine or thorough audits of search logs.
Unrestricted Data Sharing
Sharing database access across agencies with no control over external usage.
Management
Prioritizing Growth Over Safety
Flock and police focused on rapid expansion rather than locking down security.
Inconsistent Agency Policies
Management failed to enforce strict rules like mandatory judicial warrants.
Failure to Act on Warnings
Some departments let officers keep system access even after abuse allegations.
Regulatory Environment
Lack of Federal Privacy Laws
Absence of national standards left rules to individual police agencies.
Secret Camera Locations
State laws shielded camera locations and logs from public record requests.
No Standalone Misuse Crime
Some states lacked specific laws to criminally prosecute database misuse.
AI system involved
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
