This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
The Chinese government deployed the Integrated Joint Operations Platform (IJOP), an AI-driven surveillance system, to monitor and control the Uyghur and Turkic Muslim population in Xinjiang. The system aggregates biometric data, location tracking, and behavioral analysis to flag individuals for detention in political education camps. This mass surveillance infrastructure, supported by state-owned military contractors, systematically violates human rights by criminalizing peaceful religious and social activities.
A suite of AI-powered digital surveillance systems involving facial recognition and analysis of biometric data were deployed by the Chinese government in Xinjiang to monitor and discriminate local Uyghur and other Turkic Muslims.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to conduct large-scale disinformation campaigns, malicious surveillance, or targeted and sophisticated automated censorship and propaganda, with the aim of manipulating political processes, public opinion, and behavior.
Also classified as
The system is explicitly designed to target, profile, and restrict the movements of ethnic Uyghurs and Turkic Muslims.
The system systematically collects and aggregates highly sensitive, non-public personal data including biometrics and location trajectories without consent.
The Chinese government uses the IJOP system to conduct coordinated, population-level mass surveillance and social control targeting the Uyghur and Turkic Muslim population in Xinjiang.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The mass surveillance and subsequent detentions are the result of intentional decisions and actions by the Chinese government using the deployed IJOP system.
Added categories peak at 4: Severe (Psychological Harm, Indirect)
The Chinese government's deployment of the IJOP system in Xinjiang represents a critical, first-of-its-kind national security and human rights crisis. By integrating AI-driven mass surveillance with predictive policing, the state has systematically violated the civil liberties of 13 million Turkic Muslims, leading to the arbitrary detention of up to one million people.
The IJOP system acts as an assistant to law enforcement by aggregating data, identifying suspicious behaviors, and generating 'investigative missions' or alerts that prompt human officers to take action, thereby augmenting their surveillance and policing capabilities.
Unacceptable Risk: The system is used by a government for pervasive mass surveillance, biometric categorization, and profiling of a population, which violates fundamental rights and is prohibited under the EU AI Act.
The primary function of the IJOP system is to conduct mass, automated surveillance of the population in Xinjiang by aggregating and analyzing diverse data streams. It also serves a predictive policing function by flagging 'suspicious' behaviors to preemptively identify threats.
The reports provide highly detailed, first-hand technical analysis of the IJOP app obtained through reverse-engineering, alongside credible testimonies from affected individuals and extensive documentation of the system's deployment and impacts.
None. The evidence of systematic mass surveillance and human rights violations is overwhelming and consistent across multiple independent investigations.
Technology
Automated Trajectory Tracking
System tracks location of phones, IDs, and vehicles to find deviations.
Unreliable AI Facial Recognition
Scans faces at checkpoints, flagging individuals for immediate investigation.
Simple Conditional Logic Alerts
Rigid 'if-then' rules generate false positives on normal daily behaviors.
Data Inputs
Intrusive Biometric Harvesting
Massive collection of DNA, fingerprints, and irises without consent.
Everyday Behavior Data Ingestion
System logs normal activities like utility usage and package deliveries.
Tracking of Personal Relationships
Flags relations to people with new phones or foreign links as suspicious.
Human Factors
Coerced Officer Data Entry
Officials under high pressure and surveillance to enter data or face punishment.
Complete Lack of Citizen Consent
Citizens are forced to provide personal data and undergo biometric scans.
Over-reliance on System Flags
Officers blindly investigate and detain based on automated app alerts.
Process and Methods
Strike Hard Campaign Mandates
Systematic drives to maximize detentions of those deemed 'untrustworthy'.
Intrusive Home Surveillance Visits
Cadres forced to stay in homes to collect data and log personal information.
Arbitrary Investigative Missions
App triggers police missions based on 'micro-clues' like high power usage.
Management
Priority on Pervasive Social Control
Government prioritizes absolute social monitoring over individual human rights.
Officer Performance Scoring
App scores officials on task completion, incentivizing aggressive policing.
Corporate Complicity in Repression
State-owned contractors build and supply surveillance tech to the government.
Regulatory Environment
Absence of Privacy Protections
No legal limits on state biometric collection or data aggregation in China.
Lack of Judicial Oversight
No independent courts to challenge arbitrary surveillance or detentions.
State-Controlled Press and Civil Society
Absence of free press prevents public accountability for surveillance abuses.
AI system involved
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
