This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
A deepfake image depicting former President Donald Trump with an underage girl at Jeffrey Epstein's private island circulated on social media. Fact-checkers and digital forensics experts, including those using Optic's 'AI or Not' detection tool, confirmed the image was AI-generated and fake. The incident highlights the use of generative AI to create and disseminate political misinformation.
A purported deepfake image allegedly depicting Donald Trump with an underage girl at Jeffrey Epstein's private island in 1992 has reportedly been circulating on social media.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
Using AI systems to gain a personal advantage over others such as through cheating, fraud, scams, blackmail or targeted manipulation of beliefs or behavior. Examples include AI-facilitated plagiarism for research or education, impersonating a trusted or fake individual for illegitimate financial benefit, or creating humiliating or sexual imagery.
Also classified as
The AI-generated image was used to spread false claims and mislead social media users about historical events.
The incident involves the creation of a highly damaging and humiliating synthetic image of a specific individual (Donald Trump) to manipulate public beliefs about his past conduct.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The creation and dissemination of the deepfake image was an intentional act by human users to spread misinformation, utilizing a post-deployment generative AI model.
Added categories peak at 3: Substantial (Epistemic Harm, Inferred)
An AI-generated deepfake depicting former President Donald Trump was circulated on social media to spread political misinformation. While the image was quickly debunked by experts, the incident highlights the evolving threat of generative AI being used to conduct targeted political manipulation and erode public trust in visual media, posing a minor but persistent threat to societal stability and democratic processes.
The generative AI system acted as a tool to produce a synthetic image based on direct user prompts, and the Optic 'AI or Not' system functioned as a tool to analyze and verify the image's authenticity.
Limited Risk: The report describes the creation and dissemination of AI-generated content such as deepfakes, which fall under transparency obligations to ensure users are aware the content is synthetic.
The primary AI system involved was used to generate a deepfake image of a public figure, while Optic's 'AI or Not' tool was used to verify whether the image was synthetic.
The report clearly details the nature of the deepfake, the specific visual flaws identified by experts, and the verification by Optic's detection tool. There is no ambiguity about the image being fake or the role of AI in its creation.
None
While the specific image generator is unknown, this does not prevent clear classification of the incident as a deepfake-based misinformation event.
Technology
Generative AI Capabilities
AI tools enable easy creation of highly realistic synthetic images.
Flawed AI Rendering
AI model left artifacts like six fingers and mismatched eye reflections.
Human Factors
Uncritical Sharing by Users
Social media users shared the image as real without checking facts.
Political Weaponization
Using synthetic media to spread damaging political narratives.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Content Detection
Platforms lacked active automated filters to block synthetic misinformation.
AI system involved
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
