This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
A Pennsylvania State Police corporal was charged with felony unauthorized use of a computer after investigators discovered thousands of pornographic files on his work workstation. The cache included AI-generated deepfake media created using the likenesses of others. The officer has been suspended without pay pending the outcome of the investigation.
A Pennsylvania State Police corporal, Stephen Kamnik, was charged for allegedly using a work computer to store thousands of pornographic files, including content created with deepfake AI software.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
AI that exposes users to harmful, abusive, unsafe or inappropriate content. May involve providing advice or encouraging action. Examples of toxic content include hate speech, violence, extremism, illegal acts, or child sexual abuse material, as well as content that violates community norms such as profanity, inflammatory political speech, or pornography.
Also classified as
The deepfake software was used to create sexual imagery of individuals using their photos or videos without their consent.
The incident involves the creation and storage of AI-generated deepfake pornography, which constitutes toxic, inappropriate, and non-consensual sexual content violating community and legal norms.
Human
Due to a decision or action made by humans
Intentional
Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by a human user intentionally utilizing deployed deepfake software to generate and store unauthorized pornographic media on a work computer.
Added categories peak at 2: Minor (Psychological Harm, Inferred)
A Pennsylvania State Police corporal was arrested for storing AI-generated deepfakes on a work computer. While representing a serious breach of official conduct and individual privacy, the national security impact is minor and fully contained by local law enforcement and judicial processes.
The reports describe the AI as 'software to create deepfakes' which is used by a human to generate artificial images or videos from a person's photo. This fits the definition of a Tool operating on direct human input.
Limited Risk: The AI system is used to generate deepfakes, which are subject to transparency obligations under the EU AI Act.
The reports explicitly state that the software was used to create deepfakes, which are artificial images and videos created using a person's photo or video.
The reports are consistent across multiple sources regarding the charges, the seizure of the hard drive, and the presence of AI-generated deepfake pornography. The role of the AI as a tool for creating deepfakes is clear, though the specific software name and the identities/number of victims are not disclosed.
None. The facts of the arrest and the nature of the files are clearly stated.
Technology
Deepfake Generation Software
Software enabled creation of artificial pornographic media from photos.
Unrestricted Workstation Storage
Work computer lacked restrictions to block storage of unauthorized files.
Data Inputs
Target Photos and Videos
Deepfakes utilized real people's photos or videos to generate media.
Human Factors
Employee Misconduct
Corporal intentionally stored thousands of pornographic files on work computer.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Computer Auditing
Lack of proactive monitoring of work station hard drives for policy violations.
Management
Inadequate Workstation Oversight
Failure of management to enforce strict policies on work computer usage.
AI system involved
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
