This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
Students at two Australian schools, Waverley College and Kambala, were required to retake their NAPLAN writing exams after an AI-powered predictive text feature was inadvertently left enabled on their devices. The feature, which suggests text based on a user's writing style, was identified by teachers and students during the assessment. While the schools reported the issue to authorities, the incident necessitated a rescheduled test, which faced further administrative delays.
A predictive text malfunction allegedly compromised the integrity of the NAPLAN writing exam at two Sydney schools, Waverley College and Kambala, in that it allowed students to access AI-driven text suggestions. Caused by a technical oversight, this incident led to affected students being required to retake the test.
Domain classification, causal taxonomy, severity scores, and national security assessments were LLM-classified and may contain errors.
AI systems that fail to perform reliably or effectively under varying conditions, exposing them to errors and failures that can have significant consequences, especially in critical applications or areas that require moral reasoning.
Also classified as
The active AI feature presented an unauthorized and unsafe assistance capability in a critical educational assessment context.
The incident involved a technical failure where the testing environment or device configuration failed to robustly restrict the AI predictive text feature during a high-stakes exam.
Other
Due to some other reason or is ambiguous
Unintentional
Due to an unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal
Post-deployment
Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed
The incident was caused by a technical glitch or administrative oversight that unintentionally left the predictive text feature enabled during a standardized exam.
An unintentional administrative oversight left Apple's predictive text feature enabled during Australian NAPLAN writing exams at two schools. While requiring a test retake, the incident has negligible national security implications and represents a localized administrative issue rather than a threat to national infrastructure, sovereignty, or economic stability.
The report describes Apple's predictive text as a feature that 'can assist with spelling word completion and suggest responses based on a user's writing style', which fits the Assistant profile by augmenting human writing without taking independent action.
Minimal or No Risk: Apple's predictive text is a general-purpose writing assistant tool that poses low or negligible risk to users in normal operation, even though its unauthorized presence in an exam created administrative complications.
The AI system's primary function is to predict and complete words as the user types, acting as a writing assistant.
The reports clearly describe the incident, the schools involved, the specific AI feature (Apple predictive text), and the resolution (resitting the exam). There is no ambiguity about what occurred, though exact student numbers must be estimated.
None.
Technology
Active AI Predictive Text
AI-powered predictive text remained active on student devices during test.
Human Factors
Failure to Disable AI Features
Users and staff failed to manually turn off the AI writing assistant.
Process and Methods
Inadequate Device Preparation
Instructions to disable AI predictive text were not successfully executed.
Management
Inadequate Technical Oversight
School IT management did not verify that AI features were fully disabled.
Regulatory Environment
Lack of Automated Enforcement
Regulators lacked automated tools to block AI features on student devices.
AI system involved
Identified by automated extraction; can differ from the alleged developers above.
