Skip to main content
This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
BackDeceptive behavior for game-theoretical reasons

Deceptive behavior for game-theoretical reasons

Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems

Gipiškis et al. (2024)

Sub-category
Risk Domain

AI systems that develop, access, or are provided with capabilities that increase their potential to cause mass harm through deception, weapons development and acquisition, persuasion and manipulation, political strategy, cyber-offense, AI development, situational awareness, and self-proliferation. These capabilities may cause mass harm due to malicious human actors, misaligned AI systems, or failure in the AI system.

"An AI system can display deceptive behavior, such as cheating or bluffing, when engaging in such behavior is a good or optimal game-theoretical strategy to achieve the goals it has been configured to achieve. This tendency can exist in AI systems designed to maximize reward or utility, whether these designs use machine learning or not. The use of deceptive strategies has been demonstrated in both narrow and general AI systems, in both game-playing systems and in systems not explicitly designed to treat humans as opponents, and in systems using both very simple machine learning (e.g., Q-learners) and very complex machine learning [34, 73]."(p. 31)

Part of Agency (Deception)

Other risks from Gipiškis et al. (2024) (144)