Skip to main content
This is a research prototype. The data and analyses are preliminary and not yet validated — we'd welcome your .
MIT AI Risk Initiative
BackProperty damage
Self-harm
Pollution

Property damage

A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents

Li et al. (2025)

SourceDOI
Sub-category
Risk Domain
6Socioeconomic & Environmental
6.6Environmental harm

The development and operation of AI systems causing environmental harm, such as through energy consumption of data centers, or material and carbon footprints associated with AI hardware.

"Action(s) that lead directly or indirectly to the damage or destruction of tangible property eg. buildings, possessions, vehicles, robots"

Entity: Who or what caused the harm

Human

Due to a decision or action made by humans

AI system

Due to a decision or action made by an AI system

Other

Due to some other reason or is ambiguous

Intent: Whether the harm was intentional or accidental

Intentional

Due to an expected outcome from pursuing a goal

Unintentional

Due to an unexpected outcome from pursuing a goal

Other

Without clearly specifying the intentionality

Timing: Whether the risk is pre- or post-deployment

Pre-deployment

Occurring before the AI is deployed

Post-deployment

Occurring after the AI model has been trained and deployed

Other

Without a clearly specified time of occurrence

Other risks from Li et al. (2025) (40)

Autonomy

5.2 Loss of human agency and autonomy
OtherOtherOther

Autonomy > Impersonation / identity theft

4.3 Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation
HumanIntentionalPost-deployment

Misinformation Harms

3.1 False or misleading information
AI systemOtherPost-deployment

Representation and Toxicity

1.0 Discrimination & Toxicity
AI systemUnintentionalPost-deployment

IP / copyright / personality / rights loss

4.3 Fraud, scams, and targeted manipulation
HumanIntentionalPost-deployment

Autonomy / agency loss

5.2 Loss of human agency and autonomy
OtherOtherOther
View all 40 risks from this paper →